So good job on making it to the FTC of this. I know I bitched about you guys a lot at tribals and how much I hated your alliance, but the fact of the matter is, I'm not bitter. That was just someone on the outs fighting their hardest to expose cracks and make it one step ahead and fighting to stay in the game when I knew I was basically screwed and had no shot in hell at surviving, so I am not going to sit here and trash you right now, especially when I think others will most likely do it far better than I could, so I am not gonna do that.
CARTER
I was kind of a bitch to you in my vote comment the night I left. I don't feel like what I said was incorrect, but I could have said it in perhaps a less harsh way. I do think of these three you played the weakest game out of them all. However, maybe there is more to you than we know, so this would be the best time to show how much of a player you really are. So my question is, is there a side of you that we never really had a chance to see here? Are you a much more savvy player than you let on, or is how you presented yourself in this game really the type of player you are? So basically my question to you is either:
A) Are you a much better player than you get credit for, if so why is that and what is it about you that is being overlooked?
B) Should we just accept you as you are. How you presented yourself was 100% how you intended to play this game. If that is the case, why should I, and the rest of the jury, vote for you over the others?
RALPH
You have said several times that you did not really want to step up and be assertive about anything because then it would just make a huge target of yourself and you would step up your game at the FTC if you made it there. In a philosophical sense, the FTC begins the same moment that the game does. I would argue that the impression you give through the game is the impression that will stick with players regardless of what you say at FTC. I think there are 2 different types of players who make it to FTC, those who play to get to the end and those who play to win. I see you as someone who played to get to the end and not really to win. Am I wrong about that, if so, why?
COCHRAN
My question to you is, how important is luck in winning this game and making it far? Had it not been for one stray vote against Katie, you would have not even made single digits in this game, and then again your side got lucky with a rock draw. So should someone catching a few lucky breaks be held against them as a player, or should luck be embraced as part of the game and the experience as a whole?
CARTER
I was kind of a bitch to you in my vote comment the night I left. I don't feel like what I said was incorrect, but I could have said it in perhaps a less harsh way. I do think of these three you played the weakest game out of them all. However, maybe there is more to you than we know, so this would be the best time to show how much of a player you really are. So my question is, is there a side of you that we never really had a chance to see here? Are you a much more savvy player than you let on, or is how you presented yourself in this game really the type of player you are? So basically my question to you is either:
A) Are you a much better player than you get credit for, if so why is that and what is it about you that is being overlooked?
B) Should we just accept you as you are. How you presented yourself was 100% how you intended to play this game. If that is the case, why should I, and the rest of the jury, vote for you over the others?
RALPH
You have said several times that you did not really want to step up and be assertive about anything because then it would just make a huge target of yourself and you would step up your game at the FTC if you made it there. In a philosophical sense, the FTC begins the same moment that the game does. I would argue that the impression you give through the game is the impression that will stick with players regardless of what you say at FTC. I think there are 2 different types of players who make it to FTC, those who play to get to the end and those who play to win. I see you as someone who played to get to the end and not really to win. Am I wrong about that, if so, why?
COCHRAN
My question to you is, how important is luck in winning this game and making it far? Had it not been for one stray vote against Katie, you would have not even made single digits in this game, and then again your side got lucky with a rock draw. So should someone catching a few lucky breaks be held against them as a player, or should luck be embraced as part of the game and the experience as a whole?
